• Links

    • Case Review Form

      * Denotes required field.

      Title

      * First Name

      * Last Name

      * Email Address

      * Phone Number

      Cell Phone Number

      Office Phone Number

      Street Address

      Apartment/Suite

      City

      State

      Zip Code

      Please provide the best method and times to contact you:

      Date of birth of injured person
      (mm-dd-yyyy):

      Name of drug:

      Date you started taking the drug (mm-yyyy):

      Date you stopped taking the drug (mm-yyyy):

      Please describe any side effects:

      Other Info:

      No Yes, I agree to the Parker & Waichman, LLP disclaimers.Click here to review all.

      Yes, I would like to receive the Parker & Waichman, LLP monthly newsletter, InjuryAlert.

      please do not fill out the field below.

  • Archives

Pfizer accused of suppressing Neurontin study

Filed October 9th, 2008 joshua

A Boston lawsuit against Pfizer Inc. and its nerve pain drug, Neurontin, has revealed systematic manipulation of a study which said the drug was not as effective as the drug company suggested.

A British researcher had threatened to go public with a European study which suggests Neurontin was ineffective at suppressing chronic nerve pain. Pfizer, the suit alleges, worked to silence that researcher, and keep the study out of the public eye. Meanwhile, sales of Neurontin rose.

To counter the report, Pfizer launched an advertising campaign touting the benefits of the drug. A much smaller report was published in a medical journal and an ad was shown before in-flight movies, The Boston Globe reports.

Sales of Neurontin rose to $2 billion a year, when all it was originally proposed to treat was epilepsy. A generic drug ended Neurontin’s reign as one of the top-selling drugs in the U.S in 2004.

The Euro study was titled, 224, but was never published in whole. Instead, Pfizer used portions of it combined with other reports. In discovered emails, Pfizer executives campaigned to suppress the 224 study because it was not positive.

“We must delay publication of 224, as its results are not positive,” wrote one marketing exec, John Marino, in a Sept. 2000 email.

The suit further alleges Pfizer manipulated much of the information made public on Neurontin, and it alleges this misinformation led physicians to write hundreds of millions of prescriptions for a drug that simply was not effective.

Pfizer, in the face of this evidence, stands behind its ethics regarding Neurontin.

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Netvouz
  • DZone
  • ThisNext
  • MisterWong
  • Wists
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • feedmelinks

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.