<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Drug Injury blog</title>
	<link>http://www.druginjuryblog.com</link>
	<description>Brought to you by Parker Waichman Alonso LLP</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Merck&#8217;s Gardasil Didn&#8217;t Live Up to Promise</title>
		<link>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/09/mercks-gardasil-didnt-live-up-to-promise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/09/mercks-gardasil-didnt-live-up-to-promise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 00:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>meg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/09/mercks-gardasil-didnt-live-up-to-promise/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four years after Merck released cervical cancer vaccine Gardasil, the would-be top-seller has proven to be a marketplace dud.
Gardasil ran into two major roadblocks: consumer inertia and politics, rather than science and market demand.
The main problem with Gardasil seems to be the equivalent of a design flaw; to be completely immunized, women have to get [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/09/mercks-gardasil-didnt-live-up-to-promise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>British panel says Avandia should be removed from UK market</title>
		<link>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/08/british-panel-says-avandia-should-be-removed-from-uk-market/</link>
		<comments>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/08/british-panel-says-avandia-should-be-removed-from-uk-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 04:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/08/british-panel-says-avandia-should-be-removed-from-uk-market/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/08/british-panel-says-avandia-should-be-removed-from-uk-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Osteoporosis drugs linked to esophogeal cancer risk by new UK study</title>
		<link>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/03/osteoporosis-drugs-linked-to-esophogeal-cancer-risk-by-new-uk-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/03/osteoporosis-drugs-linked-to-esophogeal-cancer-risk-by-new-uk-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/03/osteoporosis-drugs-linked-to-esophogeal-cancer-risk-by-new-uk-study/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/03/osteoporosis-drugs-linked-to-esophogeal-cancer-risk-by-new-uk-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOUT study shows Meridia increases heart attack, stroke risk</title>
		<link>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/scout-study-shows-meridia-increases-heart-attack-stroke-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/scout-study-shows-meridia-increases-heart-attack-stroke-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 03:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/scout-study-shows-meridia-increases-heart-attack-stroke-risk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/scout-study-shows-meridia-increases-heart-attack-stroke-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tygacil Linked to Increase Risk, FDA Warns</title>
		<link>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/tygacil-linked-to-increase-risk-fda-warns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/tygacil-linked-to-increase-risk-fda-warns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>meg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/tygacil-linked-to-increase-risk-fda-warns/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/tygacil-linked-to-increase-risk-fda-warns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Allergan to Pay $600 Million Over Unapproved Botox Uses</title>
		<link>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/allergan-to-pay-600-million-over-unapproved-botox-uses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/allergan-to-pay-600-million-over-unapproved-botox-uses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>meg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/allergan-to-pay-600-million-over-unapproved-botox-uses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/allergan-to-pay-600-million-over-unapproved-botox-uses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avandia dangers discussed online as early as 2003</title>
		<link>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/avandia-dangers-discussed-online-as-early-as-2003/</link>
		<comments>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/avandia-dangers-discussed-online-as-early-as-2003/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 07:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/avandia-dangers-discussed-online-as-early-as-2003/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/02/avandia-dangers-discussed-online-as-early-as-2003/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abbott Labs Recalls Contact Lens Solutions Due to Sterility Hazard</title>
		<link>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/01/abbott-labs-recalls-contact-lens-solutions-due-to-sterility-hazard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/01/abbott-labs-recalls-contact-lens-solutions-due-to-sterility-hazard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>meg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/01/abbott-labs-recalls-contact-lens-solutions-due-to-sterility-hazard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/09/01/abbott-labs-recalls-contact-lens-solutions-due-to-sterility-hazard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seroquel Use Questioned in Death of Vets</title>
		<link>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/08/31/seroquel-use-questioned-in-death-of-vets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/08/31/seroquel-use-questioned-in-death-of-vets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>meg</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/08/31/seroquel-use-questioned-in-death-of-vets/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/08/31/seroquel-use-questioned-in-death-of-vets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FDA limiting use of clinical trials proving drug is no worse than another</title>
		<link>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/08/31/fda-limiting-use-of-clinical-trials-proving-drug-is-no-worse-than-another/</link>
		<comments>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/08/31/fda-limiting-use-of-clinical-trials-proving-drug-is-no-worse-than-another/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joshua</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/08/31/fda-limiting-use-of-clinical-trials-proving-drug-is-no-worse-than-another/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.druginjuryblog.com/2010/08/31/fda-limiting-use-of-clinical-trials-proving-drug-is-no-worse-than-another/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
